|
* Internet Search Results *
Fichte, theorist of the "I" - The Philosophy Forum
Fichte himself thought that one position could not refute the other. Instead we are revealed by the leap of faith we take in regard to first principles. In my view, philosophy these days largely serves as rational religion. In that sense Fichte is a theologian, except that "critical" theology engulfs and becomes the God of pre-critical theology.
A post-metaphysical (mis-)reading of Fichte (irrationalism/egoism)
Fichte points beneath rationality, beneath justifications in the realm of concept, and postulates an irrational or pre-rational urge. The systems of philosophers are the flowers of this urge. The immediate feeling of my impulse to independent activity lies at the foundation of this thought; the thought does no more than portray this feeling ...
Marxist concept of “withering away of the state”
Can anyone explain what is meant by concepts like the “withering away of the state” in Marxist theory? It seems that they are interpreted in different ways: Richard Adamiack, ‘The “Withering Away” of the State: A Reconsideration’ Frederic L. Bender, “The Ambiguities of Marx’s concepts of...
Clear distinction between Objective and Absolute Idealism
Every experience for Fichte is localized in consciousness and so the world as it appears to consciousness is the world as it is. Philosophy therefore is the reexamination of self cosciousness, what does consciousnes do when it constructs a world out of its data.
Aristotle and Idealism - The Philosophy Forum
The problem I invariably find with Kant, Fichte, Schelling, et al, is the enormously complicated and voluminous nature of their works. I am very much a Kant fan, and also have a lot of time for Schopenhauer, but as when you get into the intricacies of later German idealism, the whole thing tends to collapse under the weight of its own verbiage.
Difference between ego and the 'I' (das Ich) in Husserl's phenomenology?
I'm writing a paper on philosophical egology, and I kinda got stuck on Husserl. Up until then, especially in German Idealism, they use the terminology of the 'I', pure 'I', transcendental 'I' (in German 'Ich' and 'das Ich'), etc. Kant, Fichte, Max Stirner... even Freud doesn't use ego, but 'Das Ich...
Nature of the Philosophical Project - The Philosophy Forum
What is the philosophical project? I read a lot of non-contemporary philosophy, and a lot of out outlier material, Mannheim, Scheler, Laszlo. I also frequently revisit seminal and great works, Whitehead, Bergson, Fichte, Aristotle, Marx. I try to cover as much ground as humanly possible...
Hegel passage - The Philosophy Forum
In Fichte and Hegel I find an intense humanism, a religion of Progress and self-consciousness. To subject all irrational nature to himself, to rule over it unreservedly and according to his own laws, is the ultimate end of man; which ultimate end is perfectly unattainable, and must continue to be so, unless he were to cease to be man, and ...
Is Philosophy the "Highest" Discourse? - The Philosophy Forum
At any rate, I don't necessarily think "good readings" will always align with authorial intent. And we can also have readings where someone takes an authors work to its "logical conclusion," even if the author wanted to avoid that conclusion (e.g. Fichte and Kant). — Count Timothy von Icarus
Was Schopenhauer right? - The Philosophy Forum
Shows in superb detail the intellectual ambiance of Schopenhauer’s formative years, going right into the provenance of the particular, Persian translation of the Upaniṣad that he read (in Latin), and his relationships and interactions with his peers, including Fichte, Schelling and others.
|
